<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vista Review &#187; windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vistareview.info/category/windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vistareview.info</link>
	<description>My experiences and tips, tricks, help, resources, and bugs found upgrading to Windows Vista</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 and Windows 3.1</title>
		<link>http://www.vistareview.info/2008/11/11/windows-7-and-windows-31/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistareview.info/2008/11/11/windows-7-and-windows-31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows 3.1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistareview.info/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

A lot of people are talking about Windows 7, and really do wonder if the release date will actually be June 2009 or not. There seem to be many people testing it, and in fact this post says that it boots faster than both XP and Vista. It looks like at first glance too, that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<p>A lot of people are talking about Windows 7, and really do wonder if the release date will actually be June 2009 or not. There seem to be many people testing it, and in fact <a href="http://www.mobilewhack.com/windows-7-faster-than-vista-or-xp/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.mobilewhack.com');">this post</a> says that it boots faster than both XP and Vista. It looks like at first glance too, that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5078088/windows-7-will-only-have-one-ready-sticker-down-from-vistas-four" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/gizmodo.com');">Windows 7 is only having one &#8220;ready&#8221; sticker</a>. Does that mean it will only have one version? With Windows 7 coming out, it makes you think about all the versions of Windows that came before it&#8230;did you know that Microsoft <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10082242-1.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');">just stopped selling Windows 3.1 licenses</a>? That really shocked me&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://mazurland.typepad.com/myweblog/2008/11/windows-vista-is-a-piece-of-crap.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/mazurland.typepad.com');">Vista is a piece of crap</a>, really makes me laugh. It&#8217;s sooooo like the problems people have with vista everyday.</p>
<div class="aizattos_related_posts"><span class="aizattos_related_posts_header" >Related Posts</span><ul><li><span class="aizattos_related_posts_title">No related posts</span></li></ul></div>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistareview.info/2008/11/11/windows-7-and-windows-31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
